I’d really like to hear the rationalization behind the decision to let baby daddy walk and kick baby mama out. I think it’s fun to watch sex-obsessed mental midgets do intellectual backflips. Is there any possible justification for this? Normally I can detect a small bit of reason in even the most misguided actions, but this one has me stumped. Just pathetic.
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
About Me
Blog Archive
-
▼
2005
(395)
-
▼
May
(31)
- Question
- Sting
- TOP FIVE SKYSCRAPERS IN THE USA
- Bolton
- California gets all the cool festivals
- Robert Rubin reads this blog
- Flip Flop
- Gun Control
- The Wrong Fight
- More Records
- Broken Record
- TOP FIVE BEST ROCK SINGERS - not in order
- Crazy for a Deal
- No Mom, Yes Dad
- 50 books
- Deal
- War on Drugs
- Bill Murray
- Culture of Life
- Nationalism
- Advise and Consent poll
- Plead guilty vs. plead insanity
- You can rationalize anything
- Posting without a title here. Just trying to get ...
- Would cat-blog, but have no cat
- Pres. Bush
- Hillary
- Format
- Coldplay
- Filibuster
- Post Number 1
-
▼
May
(31)
War in Iraq
Blogs
- Talking Points Memo
- Daily Kos
- Daily Dish
- Political Animal
- Eschaton
- Rubber Hose
- Echidne of the Snakes
- Unclaimed Territories
- Orcinus
- Huffington Post
- Daniel Drezner
- Ezra Klein
- Shakespeare's Sister
- Majikthise
- Pandagon
- Agitprop
- Hullabaloo
- Crooked Timber
- AmericaBlog
- Rox Populi
- Angry Bear
- Democracy Arsenal
- The Volokh Conspiracy
- Smirking Chimp
- Crooks and Liars
- Balloon Juice
- Talk Left
- Brad DeLong's SDJ
- Winds Of Change
- Rising Hegemon
- OxBlog
- Sadly, No!
- Crackerdog
- Carpetbagger Report
- Driftglass
- The Liberal Avenger
- Fire Joe Morgan
Really Big Blogs
Other Stuff
"The significant problems we have cannot be solved at the same level of thinking with which we created them."
"We used to think that if we knew one, we knew two, because one and one are two. We are finding that we must learn a great deal more about 'and.'"
"I believe it is an established maxim in morals that he who makes an assertion without knowing whether it is true or false is guilty of falsehood, and the accidental truth of the assertion does not justify or excuse him."
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it."
"The difficulty lies not so much in developing new ideas as in escaping from old ones."
"One man with courage makes a majority."
"A stupid man's report of what a clever man says can never be accurate, because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand."
"When I tell any truth it is not for the sake of convincing those who do not know it, but for the sake of defending those who do."
"Judge of a man by his questions rather than by his answers."
"But what is strength without a double share of wisdom?"
"We don't see things as they are, we see them as we are."
"The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men."
"How much easier it is to be critical than to be correct."
"What we hope ever to do with ease we must first learn to do with diligence."
"It is hard enough to remember my opinions, without also remembering my reasons for them!"
I can't believe these people. Have some decency!
Zero. None. No reason whatsoever, aside from pure, unadulterated stupidity.
The misguided justification is to try to control teen pregnancies by making sure that girls know that they will be punished. It is probably THE classic way to limit unwanted pregnancies; you put all the responsibility on the female. The male won't control himself anyway, so you make damn sure that the women knows that she will be held at fault if there is a baby.
Post a Comment